Web app QA that runs itself.

Traditional test automation verifies predefined scenarios that developers or QA engineers manually script and maintain. These tests only check behavior someone explicitly encoded, so coverage depends on how completely those scenarios were anticipated. QA365 approaches validation fundamentally differently. Instead of relying on scripted tests, it derives validation from the structure of your application and ticket specifications - including pages, entities, user flows, and permissions - automatically generating coverage that evolves alongside your application, without requiring teams to write or maintain test suites.

In addition, when a ticket introduces a change, that change is evaluated against the application model to identify all affected areas and generate acceptance criteria for them. These areas can extend beyond what the ticket explicitly describes, updating the expected behavior for those surfaces and revealing inconsistencies that scripted automation would miss. All generated acceptance criteria are fully visible and editable, allowing teams to review or refine them and surfacing missing considerations where applicable.

No.

QA365 runs a deterministic validation workflow derived from a semantic index of your application structure. Every generated acceptance criterion, scenario, and execution result is fully visible and inspectable.

Ticket-based testing validates the impacted areas of individual tickets after they are implemented, providing fast feedback during development and revealing gaps when requirements were incomplete.

Release validation evaluates the entire application before deployment to surface unintended changes or interactions between multiple changes, preventing them from reaching production.

Yes.

QA365 is designed for applications with many interconnected pages, entities, and permission rules — the kinds of systems where manual QA becomes difficult to maintain.

Because validation is derived from the application structure itself, QA365 adapts to each product during onboarding rather than relying on predefined test flows.

That depends on the role of manual QA in your team.

QA365 automates structured validation work such as identifying impacted areas not explicitly mentioned in the ticket, testing ticket implementation, maintaining regression coverage, and executing release validation.

It does not perform activities like product validation, UX review, or requirement discussions. These responsibilities are handled by different roles depending on the team (for example by QA engineers in some teams, by UI/UX designers in others).

Very little.

QA365 integrates with your issue tracker and builds a structural model of the application during onboarding. The system continuously maintains this model as the application evolves.

Once established, validation runs automatically as tickets are implemented and before releases. Teams do not need to write tests, maintain scripts, or manually expand validation scope.

Onboarding begins by connecting your issue tracker and semantically indexing your application, which typically takes about two weeks depending on the size and complexity of your application. This setup is handled by our team and does not require configuration from your side.

During the initial rollout period, all validation outputs are manually reviewed by our engineers to establish system correctness. Afterward, a small percentage continues to be reviewed to ensure long-term quality.